Feeding tubes for cerebral palsy adults-Feeding and Nutrition Interventions in Cerebral Palsy | Effective Health Care Program

NCBI Bookshelf. Comparative Effectiveness Reviews, No. Though the disorder is nonprogressive, the clinical manifestations may change over time as the brain develops, with other neurologic impairments frequently co-occurring. Due to advances in supportive medical care, approximately 90 percent of children with CP survive into adulthood, resulting in an additional estimated , adults living with CP in the United States. CP includes a spectrum of disorders of movement, posture, and coordination with heterogeneous etiologies.

Feeding tubes for cerebral palsy adults

The other retrospective case series of 57 individuals 48 reported that the highest proportion of individuals reaching weight for height were Saint michaels twink acadamy the groups that had surgery before age 2, had had their gastrostomy for at least 2 years or had fundoplication. Impact of gastrostomy tube feeding on the quality of life of carers of children with cerebral palsy. The goal for management of CP is to improve the quality of life for both the child and family, through interventions that maximize independence in activities of daily living, mobility, and nutrition. Comorbidities and clinical determinants of outcome in children with spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy. We note that there is a complete lack of studies designed or powered to identify modifiers of effectiveness of the behavioral interventions. J Pediatr Surg. Two studies specifically Feeding tubes for cerebral palsy adults surgical interventions targeting significant reflux. Search Effective Health Care website Submit search. J Clin Epidemiol. Department of Health and Human Services.

Arab in nude. Background and Objectives the Systematic Review

Muscle weakness or loss of movement in a group of muscles paralysis. Alejandra Viviescas, PhD. Diagnostic and therapeutic approach to vomiting and gastroparesis in children with neurological and neuromuscular handicap. In some people Feeding tubes for cerebral palsy adults cerebral palsy, parts of the brain are injured due to a low level of oxygen hypoxia in those areas. If you suspect that your son or daughter has developed a mental health condition as they enter adulthood, there are many important warning signs to look out for. Enteral nutrition. Children with severe neurological impairment cerebrxl at increased risk of growth disorders palay nutritional deficiencies. Minerva Pediatr. Discussion Strauss first raised the prospect that tube feeding in children with neurological impairment might be associated with an increased mortality due to aspiration. See full glossary. Medicines may include: Anticonvulsants to prevent or reduce the frequency of seizures Botulinum toxin to help with spasticity and drooling Muscle relaxants to reduce tremors and spasticity Surgery may be needed in some cases Feeding tubes for cerebral palsy adults Control gastroesophageal reflux Cut certain nerves from the spinal cord to help with pain and spasticity Place feeding tubes Release joint contractures.

Use the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues.

  • Sources of information for the article are listed at the bottom.
  • It is a form of enteral feeding, where food is delivered directly into the stomach.
  • Children with cerebral palsy have difficulties eating by themselves, which leads to poor nutrition and other complications that are usually resolved by using a feeding tube.
  • Aims: To determine benefits and risks for gastrostomy or jejunostomy feeding compared with oral feeding for children with cerebral palsy.

The motor disorders of cerebral palsy are often accompanied by disturbances of secondary musculoskeletal problems. Though the disorder is nonprogressive, the clinical manifestations may change over time as the brain develops, with other neurologic impairments frequently co-occurring. Due to advances in supportive medical care, approximately 90 percent of children with CP survive into adulthood, resulting in an additional estimated , adults living with CP in the United States.

CP includes a spectrum of disorders of movement, posture, and coordination with heterogeneous etiologies. The diversity of the clinical features is reflected in multiple classification systems that include reference to type of motor dysfunction, body parts affected, severity, and functional abilities see Table 1. Of note, in classifying on motor function, spastic CP accounts for 70 to 80 percent of all cases of CP, with dyskinetic accounting for 10 to 15 percent and ataxic for 15 percent, though combinations of clinical manifestations are common.

Further classification is by severity level mild, moderate, severe and gross motor function GMFCS , which reflects the functional capabilities of the affected. Although CP is a motor disorder, many children and adults with CP suffer with other developmental disabilities, including intellectual disability, impaired vision and hearing, language and behavioral disorders, and epilepsy.

Population-based studies have reported the proportion of children with CP who have intellectual disability ranges from 31 to 65 percent, and the proportion that have epilepsy ranges from 20 to 46 percent. Cerebral palsy is often classified by severity level as mild, moderate, severe, or no CP. These are broad generalizations that lack a specific set of criteria. Even when doctors agree on the level of severity, the classification provides little specific information, especially when compared to the GMFCS.

Still, this method is common and offers a simple method of communicating the scope of impairment, which can be useful when accuracy is not necessary. When used with motor function classification, this provides a description of how and where a child is affected by cerebral palsy. Individuals with CP frequently have feeding and swallowing problems that may lead to poor nutritional status, growth failure, chronic aspiration, esophagitis, and respiratory infections.

Across the CP spectrum, poor nutritional status is caused by distinct pathways ranging from inadequate intake, oral dysphagia, oropharyngeal dysphagia, gastroesophageal reflux GER , and chronic aspiration. Some patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia and GER, particularly those with severe CP, are also at risk for recurrent aspiration that can lead to chronic pulmonary disease. Patients with feeding difficulties range from those with self-feeding skills to those with severe disability GMFCS V who require extensive use of assisted technology and are dependent on others to feed them.

Indeed, chronic pulmonary disease related to aspiration is the leading cause of death among patients with severe CP. Caregiver burden is also a significant concern, as the feeding process may require considerable time and may be associated with stress and caregiver fatigue.

A number of feeding and oral-motor intervention strategies have been developed to address difficulties with sucking, chewing, swallowing and to improve oral-motor skills, including oral sensorimotor management, positioning, oral appliances, food thickeners, specialized formulas, and neuromuscular stimulation. These interventions address different aspects of feeding difficulties, reflecting the range in specific problems associated with feeding and nutrition in patients with CP.

Sensorimotor techniques seek to strengthen oral-motor control and counteract abnormal tone and reflexes to improve oral feedings and typically require months of daily application.

Positioning techniques address poor postural alignment and control that exacerbates swallowing difficulties and include stabilizing the neck and trunk. Positioning interventions are individualized and often guided by videofluoroscopy to optimize swallowing. Oral appliances have been used to stabilize the jaw and improve sucking, tongue coordination, lip control, and chewing. Multiple approaches may be used in children with growth failure, including sensorimotor stimulation, positioning, food thickeners, and caloric supplementation.

For children with moderate to severe aspiration or malnutrition related to oropharyngeal dysphagia and GER, surgical interventions with gastrostomy tube feeding directly into the stomach or jejunostomy tubes and antireflux procedures may be necessary to improve nutritional status and reduce risk of chronic aspiration. The goal for management of CP is to improve the quality of life for both the child and family, through interventions that maximize independence in activities of daily living, mobility, and nutrition.

Guidelines have been published by the American Academy of Neurology on the use of pharmacologic agents to treat spasticity in children and adolescents with CP. Limited information is available on the impact on long-term health outcomes, including quality of life.

Despite the availability of multiple and diverse interventions to address feeding difficulties, the optimal combination of interventions and the effectiveness in different patient populations with CP is unknown. Consideration of effectiveness likely depends on the type of CP spastic or nonspastic , the location of motor involvement e.

Comorbid conditions, particularly intellectual disability related to ability to monitor and maintain appropriate nutrient intake , and concurrent medications that potentially have gastrointestinal side effects may influence treatment outcomes. Different feeding interventions may perform differently across the spectrum of CP.

For example, oral-motor interventions may be highly effective in populations with oral dysphagia with malnutrition. However, these same interventions could have less value in less mobile populations who are experiencing pharyngeal dysphagia with aspiration. Gastrostomy feeding may reduce aspiration during swallowing but does not address aspiration of oral secretions and could exacerbate GER.

Additional interventions, such as positioning and caloric supplementation, may still be needed. To examine the overall effectiveness of interventions intended to improve feeding and nutrition outcomes in patients with CP, adequate characterization of the patient populations will be essential.

Additionally, the need for management into later life has increased, and the optimal interventions for adults with feeding difficulties are unknown. Harms associated with feeding interventions have not been thoroughly reviewed, and significant concerns have been raised about potential serious harms related to surgical interventions, including new or worsening GER, risk of aspiration, and mortality.

The impact of antireflux procedures in addition to gastrostomy is also unknown. Finally, there is a need to understand the potential impact of feeding interventions on families and caregivers as substantial caregiver time and training may be required.

CP is a significant health problem with major effects over the lifespan. Feeding difficulties affect individuals with CP of all ages and severity levels. Considerable uncertainty remains regarding the appropriate interventions, especially in older individuals.

We received few actionable comments, and none required revisions to the KQs: One comment addressed the need to consider the effect of tube feeding on pulmonary toilet, including effects on chest percussion therapy and other modalities, in assessing effectiveness. Another comment noted the importance of considering the quality of nutritional substances in addition to the quantity.

Is the effectiveness of behavioral interventions modified by age, race, severity, functional status e. When compared with other nonsurgical interventions or no intervention, how effective are nutritional interventions food thickeners, caloric supplementation with formulas, vitamin supplementation, and altering food consistency [e. Is the effectiveness of nutritional interventions modified by age, race, severity, functional status e.

What is the comparative effectiveness of tube feeding when compared with oral feeding or with nutritional and behavioral interventions in individuals with CP who present with feeding difficulties, including malnourishment, failure to thrive, aspiration, and excessive caregiver burden?

Is the effectiveness of tube feeding modified by tube placement, age, race, severity, functional status e. For each KQ, the relevant population, interventions, comparators, outcomes, timing, and setting are as follows:. Positioning, oral appliances, oral stimulation, sensorimotor facilitation, and caregiver training. Food thickeners, caloric supplementation with formulas, vitamin supplementation, and altering food consistency e.

Individuals with CP and feeding difficulties who initially present without reflux but develop reflux following g-tube placement all ages and severities. The analytic framework in Figure 1 illustrates the population, interventions, and outcomes that will guide the literature search and synthesis.

Circles on the diagram indicate areas in which KQs will be addressed in the review. We will conduct searches from to the present to ensure comprehensive retrieval. We will limit retrieval to English-language studies only as we identified a high number of international studies in our initial scan of the literature and feel that globally relevant studies are likely being identified. Based on our initial scan of the literature, we anticipate that a recent review addressing behavioral interventions 28 and one addressing gastrostomy 38 may be good candidates for this approach.

We will also collect data on modifiers of interest as specified in KQs 2b and 3d, specifically age, race, severity, functional status, initial nutritional status, and continuous or bolus feeding. The form also will include a field in which to report the funding source of a study.

We expect that the data-collection forms will undergo several revisions as these tests are completed. For studies that meet the conditions of the second-round assessment, the abstractors will extract key data and study-quality elements from the article s and enter them into evidence tables.

A second reviewer will review those data-extraction forms against the original articles for quality control. Differences in data coding between the abstractor and the reviewer will be resolved by consensus.

The abstractor will note the reason s for exclusion on the article abstraction form. We will assess the quality of studies using the following established tools Appendix B for various study types:. Two senior investigators will independently assess each included study, with disagreements between assessors resolved through discussion to reach consensus. From our scan of the literature, we anticipate that the bulk of the literature will consist of case series.

While case series are typically considered poor quality, we will complete quality assessments to inform our commentary on the relative merits of or caveats related to each study.

We will retain poor-quality studies as part of the evidence base. We will use explicit criteria for rating the overall strength of the evidence for each key intervention-outcome pair for which the overall risk of bias is not overwhelmingly high. We will use established concepts of the quantity of evidence e. We will make these judgments as appropriate for each of the KQs. Risk of bias is derived from the quality assessment of the individual studies that addressed the KQ and specific outcome under consideration.

Each key outcome on each comparison of interest will be given an overall evidence grade based on the ratings for the individual domains. When no studies are available for an outcome or comparison of interest, we will grade the evidence as insufficient.

Two senior staff will independently grade the body of evidence; disagreements will be resolved as needed through discussion or third-party adjudication. We will record strength of evidence assessments in tables, summarizing for each outcome. We will also review potential modifiers of effect of treatment to identify subgroups, which may include different age groups or levels of severity or functional status. We also anticipate methodological heterogeneity in behavioral interventions such as caregiver training and variations in availability of some interventions.

In the event of protocol amendments, the date of each amendment will be accompanied by a description of the change and the rationale. Example table below:. In addition, for Comparative Effectiveness Reviews, the Key Questions were posted for public comment and finalized by the EPC after review of the comments. Key Informants are the end-users of research, including patients and caregivers, practicing clinicians, relevant professional and consumer organizations, purchasers of health care, and others with experience in making health care decisions.

Within the EPC program, the Key Informant role is to provide input into identifying the Key Questions for research that will inform health care decisions. The EPC solicits input from Key Informants when developing questions for systematic review or when identifying high-priority research gaps and needed new research.

Key Informants are not involved in analyzing the evidence or writing the report and have not reviewed the report, except as given the opportunity to do so through the peer or public review mechanism. Because of their role as end-users, individuals are invited to serve as Key Informants and those who present with potential conflicts may be retained.

Technical Experts comprise a multidisciplinary group of clinical, content, and methodological experts who provide input in defining populations, interventions, comparisons, or outcomes, as well as identifying particular studies or databases to search. They are selected to provide broad expertise and perspectives specific to the topic under development. Technical Experts provide information to the EPC to identify literature search strategies and recommend approaches to specific issues as requested by the EPC.

Technical Experts do not do analysis of any kind nor contribute to the writing of the report and have not reviewed the report, except as given the opportunity to do so through the public review mechanism. Because of their unique clinical or content expertise, individuals are invited to serve as Technical Experts and those who present with potential conflicts may be retained. Peer reviewers are invited to provide written comments on the draft report based on their clinical, content, or methodological expertise.

Search strategy: electronic databases—Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase, Cinahl, Lilacs, databases of theses, grey literature. Mothers' experiences caring for children with disabilities who require a gastrostomy tube. Walking and swallowing disorders are likely to present a few added challenges, but their effects can be managed with proper treatment. Abstract Background Children with severe neurological impairment may have significant oral motor dysfunction and are at increased risk of nutritional deficiencies, poor growth, and aspiration pneumonia. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it. Fees may apply for specialist services, feeding equipment and formula.

Feeding tubes for cerebral palsy adults

Feeding tubes for cerebral palsy adults

Feeding tubes for cerebral palsy adults

Feeding tubes for cerebral palsy adults. More about gastrostomy

Allow your child to touch the food and smell it before attempting to feed. Children with cerebral palsy often have trouble swallowing all of their food. This can become a problem especially if the child is not getting enough nutrition. You may need to utilize the services of a physiotherapist, especially if your child has trouble swallowing.

Some children with cerebral palsy tend to thrust their tongue and have a hard time keeping their mouths closed. You can help by providing soft foods that can be swallowed and digested easier. Practice the step over and over until the child grasps the concept and learns to use the spoon alone.

Keep in mind that this may take quite a bit of training and your child may not pick up on it right away. The professional members of the feeding team should include a gastroenterologist, occupational therapist, speech therapist, dietitian, nurse, and psychologist. She has extensive experience working with pediatric patients in a range of settings and is currently practicing as an advanced practice provider.

Skip links Skip to primary navigation Skip to content Skip to primary sidebar Skip to footer. Cerebral Palsy Eating and Feeding Tips. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC. Abstract Background Children with severe neurological impairment may have significant oral motor dysfunction and are at increased risk of nutritional deficiencies, poor growth, and aspiration pneumonia.

Aim To examine the occurrence of respiratory morbidity before and after gastrostomy feeding tube insertion in children with severe neurological disabilities.

Methods This study was nested in a longitudinal, prospective, uncontrolled, multicentre cohort study designed to investigate the outcomes of gastrostomy tube feeding in 57 children with severe neurological disabilities. Conclusion This study provides no evidence for an increase in respiratory morbidity following insertion of a feeding gastrostomy in children with cerebral palsy.

Keywords: aspiration, cerebral palsy, gastrostomy, respiratory infection. Methods Study design This study was nested in a longitudinal, prospective, uncontrolled, multicentre cohort study designed to investigate the outcomes of gastrostomy tube feeding in children with severe neurological disabilities. Setting The study was set in specialist multidisciplinary feeding clinics for children with neurological disabilities in Oxford, Manchester, and Watford in the United Kingdom.

Intervention: gastrostomy placement Those children in whom insertion of a gastrostomy tube was deemed clinically indicated underwent detailed preoperative workup. Baseline n Median range Age 57 4.

Open in a separate window. Gastrostomy placement Fifty three children had percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies PEG placed, while four had open gastrostomies. Discussion Strauss first raised the prospect that tube feeding in children with neurological impairment might be associated with an increased mortality due to aspiration.

What this study adds No evidence of an increase in respiratory morbidity has been found in the 12 months following insertion of a gastrostomy feeding tube Insertion of a gastrostomy tube invariably accompanied by a reduced oral intake led to an apparent reduction in chest infections in those who had a proven unsafe swallow and were unable to protect their airway during feeding.

Conclusion In this longitudinal, prospective, uncontrolled, multicentre cohort study we have failed to find any evidence of increased respiratory morbidity in children with cerebral palsy secondary to insertion of a gastrostomy feeding tube. References 1. Dev Med Child Neurol 42 10— J Am Diet Assoc 3— Dev Med Child Neurol 45 — Gastrointest Endosc 50 — Growth in children with cerebral palsy fed via gastrostomy. Pediatrics 82 — J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 26 — Dev Med Child Neurol 47 77— Dev Med Child Neurol 37 — Dev Med Child Neurol 46 — Dev Med Child Neurol 39 — Darwish H.

Living with cerebral palsy and tube feeding: easier to feed but at what cost? Sleigh G, Brocklehurst P. Gastrostomy feeding in cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Arch Dis Child 89 — N Engl J Med — Am J Dis Child 3— J Pediatr — Seddon P C, Khan Y. Respiratory problems in children with neurological impairment.

Arch Dis Child 88 75— Prevalence of feeding problems and oral motor dysfunction in children with cerebral palsy: a community survey.

Pediatrics — Dev Med Child Neurol 35 3— Respiratory tract infections due to direct and reflux aspiration in children with severe neurodisability. Dev Med Child Neurol 41 — Pediatrics 99 — J Pediatr 3— Sullivan P B. Gastrostomy feeding in the disabled child: when is an antireflux procedure required? Arch Dis Child 81 — Dev Med Child Neurol 47 — Arch Phys Med Rehabil 73 — Dysphagia 9 69— Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy without an antireflux procedure in neurologically disabled children.

Clin Pediatr Phila 36 25— Pediatr Infect Dis J 23 —

Gastrostomy feeding for children | Cerebral Palsy Alliance

Children with cerebral palsy have difficulties eating by themselves, which leads to poor nutrition and other complications that are usually resolved by using a feeding tube. Feeding tubes are associated with numerous benefits for children and their families, but also carry risks associated with tube placement and maintenance. Researchers reviewed the medical records of children with cerebral palsy who presented with a feeding tube-related complaint to two pediatric emergency departments in the Australian state of Victoria between and However, only presentations were considered due to missing data.

Eighty-seven cerebral palsy patients accounted for these presentations, of which The remaining were due to other types of feeding tubes not considered in the study. Gastrojejunal tube-related emergencies had a higher risk of resulting in overnight hospitalizations. Your email address will not be published. Author Details.

Alejandra Viviescas, PhD. As a writer for BioNews, she is fulfilling her passion for making scientific data easily available and understandable to the general public. Aside from her work with BioNews, she also works as a language editor for non-English speaking authors and is an author of science books for kids.

Print This Page. Leave a Comment Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. Pin It on Pinterest. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it. We never use your cookies for creepy ad retargeting that follows you around the web.

Feeding tubes for cerebral palsy adults